Rickettsiales occurrence and co-occurrence in Ixodes ricinus ticks in natural and urban areas
PBN-AR
Instytucja
Instytut Parazytologii im. Witolda Stefańskiego Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Informacje podstawowe
Główny język publikacji
angielski
Czasopismo
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
ISSN
0095-3628
EISSN
1432-184X
Wydawca
SPRINGER
DOI
URL
Rok publikacji
2019
Numer zeszytu
4
Strony od-do
890-904
Numer tomu
77
Identyfikator DOI
Liczba arkuszy
Słowa kluczowe
angielski
Rickettsiales
angielski
Rickettsia helvetica
angielski
Anaplasma phagocytophilum
angielski
Neoehrlichia mikurensis
angielski
Ixodes ricinus
angielski
Urban
angielski
Natural
angielski
City
angielski
Co-infection
Open access
Tryb otwartego dostępu
Inne
Wersja tekstu w otwartym dostępie
Wersja opublikowana
Licencja otwartego dostępu
Inna
Czas opublikowania w otwartym dostępie
Przed publikacją
Data udostępnienia w sposób otwarty
Streszczenia
Język
angielski
Treść
Bacteria of Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae families include disease agents spread by Ixodes ricinus ticks, the most common tick vector in Europe. The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence and co-infection prevalence of particular tick-transmitted Rickettsiales members: Rickettsia spp. (further referred as Rs), Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Ap), and “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” (CNM) in I. ricinus ticks in two types of areas, different in terms of human impact: natural and urban. Using additional data, we aimed at investigating co-occurrence of these Rickettsiales with Borreliella spp. A total of 4189 tick specimens, 2363 from the urban area (Warsaw park and forests) and 1826 from the natural area (forests and park in the vicinity of National Parks), were tested for the presence of Rickettsiales DNA by PCRs. The prevalence of selected Rickettsiales was twice higher in urban than natural areas (13.2% vs. 6.9%, respectively). In total ticks, the prevalence of Rs, Ap, and CNM was 6.5%, 5.3%, and 3.6% in urban areas vs. 4.4%, 1.1%, and 2.1% in natural areas, respectively. Co-infections of Rickettsiales were also more prevalent in urban areas (2.6% vs. 0.3%, respectively). The most common Rs was R. helvetica; also R. monacensis and novel “Candidatus Rickettsia mendelii” were detected. Positive association between Ap and CNM infections was discovered. Rickettsiales bacteria occurrence was not associated with Borreliella occurrence, but co-infections with these two groups were more common in ticks in urban areas. In conclusion, three groups of Rickettsiales constituted the important part of the tick pathogen community in Poland, especially in the urbanized central Poland (Mazovia). In the Warsaw agglomeration, there is a greater risk of encountering the I. ricinus tick infected with Rickettsiales and co-infected with Lyme spirochaetes, in comparison to natural areas. This finding raises the question whether cities might in fact be the hot spots for TBDs.
Cechy publikacji
Original paper
Inne
System-identifier
PX-5d52a6b2d5de22ee87a240ac