×

Serwis używa ciasteczek ("cookies") i podobnych technologii m.in. do utrzymania sesji i w celach statystycznych. • Ustawienia przeglądarki dotyczące obsługi ciasteczek można swobodnie zmieniać. • Całkowite zablokowanie zapisu ciasteczek na dysku komputera uniemożliwi logowanie się do serwisu. • Więcej informacji: Polityka cookies OPI PIB

×

Regulamin korzystania z serwisu PBN znajduję się pod adresem: Regulamin serwisu

Szukaj wśród:
Dane publikacji

Peak Finder Metaserver - a novel application for finding peaks in ChIP-seq data

Artykuł
Czasopismo : BMC BIOINFORMATICS   Tom: 14, Strony: 280
Marcin Kruczyk [1] , [2] , Hausen Umer [1] , Stefan Enroth [3] , Jan Komorowski [1] , [4]
2013 angielski
Link do publicznie dostępnego pełnego tekstu
Identyfikatory
-
Cechy publikacji
-
  • Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
  • Zrecenzowana naukowo
Słowa kluczowe
-
Abstrakty ( angielski )
-
Background Finding peaks in ChIP-seq is an important process in biological inference. In some cases, such as positioning nucleosomes with specific histone modifications or finding transcription factor binding specificities, the precision of the detected peak plays a significant role. There are several applications for finding peaks (called peak finders) based on different algorithms (e.g. MACS, Erange and HPeak). Benchmark studies have shown that the existing peak finders identify different peaks for the same dataset and it is not known which one is the most accurate. We present the first meta-server called Peak Finder MetaServer (PFMS) that collects results from several peak finders and produces consensus peaks. Our application accepts three standard ChIP-seq data formats: BED, BAM, and SAM. Results Sensitivity and specificity of seven widely used peak finders were examined. For the experiments we used three previously studied Transcription Factors (TF) ChIP-seq datasets and identified three of the selected peak finders that returned results with high specificity and very good sensitivity compared to the remaining four. We also ran PFMS using the three selected peak finders on the same TF datasets and achieved higher specificity and sensitivity than the peak finders individually. Conclusions We show that combining outputs from up to seven peak finders yields better results than individual peak finders. In addition, three of the seven peak finders outperform the remaining four, and running PFMS with these three returns even more accurate results. Another added value of PFMS is a separate report of the peaks returned by each of the included peak finders.
Zacytuj dokument
-